Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HQ9+ (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will SALT also due to recreation issues. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HQ9+

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article could be speedy-deleted as WP:CSD#G4 since it was deleted following this debate. But it was 13 years ago and it was a close decision so I suppose it's fair to revisit the issue. I'm personally ambivalent. It's a joke language and a pretty silly one at that but it appears to be semi-famous as far as joke languages go. Pichpich (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was Delete arguments are stronger, and there is no double jeapordy in Wiki. An article which is notable will survive all reasonable XfD's. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions:

2007-02 ✗ Delete arguments are stronger, and there is no double jeapordy in Wiki. An article which is notable will survive all reasonable XfD's

, 2006-10 ✓ keep

Related discussions: 2006-09 2L programming language Arrrrghhhhhh!, 2006-03 4DL programming language annoyed

Logs: 2020-05 ✍️ create, 2016-11 ✗ deleted, 2016-01 ✗ G4, 2013-12 move to → User:Rezonansowy/HQ9+, 2013-12 ↻ restored, 2010-07 ✗ G4, 2007-02 ✗ deleted, 2006-03 ↻ restored, 2006-03 ✗ deleted

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:25, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of notability. Votes for keep in '07 centered around the fact that 'people were talking about it'. People aren't talking about it anymore, and I can find no sources to indicate passing WP:GNG. Suggest perhaps salting as has been deleted multiple times in the past, this is the fourth time the article has been taken to Afd and consensus has been reached to delete (also discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatnik programming language). There's no indication it will become notable in the future. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Joke languages attract a bit of interest at first and are then forgotten. I see no indication that this is notable. Bduke (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. You may find this discussion useful: Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016 October 30#HQ9+ WikiMaster111 (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Note that the outcome of the discussion I linked is that the article should not just be recopied over from Simple English Wikipedia, which is exactly what this article is. WikiMaster111 (talk) 16:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HQ9+ (3rd nomination)

HQ9+

zproxy.org